Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:37

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

2025 NFL All-Paid Team: Saquon Barkley, Dak Prescott headline top earners by position - NFL.com

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

What’s next?

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Discovery of 100-million-year-old dinosaur eggs reveals life in Jurassic America - Earth.com

Just in the last 5 years:

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Russia can stop this any time.

US dollar suffers worst start to year since 1973 - Financial Times

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Why do a bra and panties have to match?

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Thank you.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Why do older men like to get anal sex?

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Defiant Tusk to call confidence vote to reassert his authority in Poland after election setback - politico.eu

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Let’s just make it real clear:

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Stock futures fall as investors eye Israel-Iran conflict: Live updates - CNBC

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

How Acetaminophen Silences Pain Before It Reaches the Brain - Neuroscience News

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Why do you write?